Legal Opinion
Altman v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBirdzell, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered in the district court of Stark county.
I. II. Pifer had an ice harvesting contract with the Northern Pacific Pailway Company and the plaintiff was employed in his service at Dickinson, North Dakota. The operations of Pifer extended through several states, and, while he lived at Larimore, North Dakota, his winter headquarters were at Spokane, Washington. The plaintiff was injured in the course of his employment at Thorpe, in the state of Washington, in January, 1921. Pifer paid premiums in the state of Washington for all men…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Post v. . Burger GohlkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Gould's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- North Alaska Salmon Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Gotchy v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Claim of Smith v. Heine Safety Boiler Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc. v. VolentineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Bradford Elec. Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pound v. GauldingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Hargis v. McWilliams Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.