Legal Opinion

Natco Corporation v. Mallory

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 28, 1955No. 6 Div. 728PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

This is a certiorari to review a ruling ’and judgment of the circuit court awarding compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Alabama.

There is no complaint by the employer in respect to the correctness of the finding of facts. The complaint is, that as a matter of law the facts as thus found do not support the right to compensation. The facts found by the trial judge material to the inquiry, not here repeating the formal incidents of his (employee’s) employment, showing the application of the’Workmen’s Compensation Law, are as follows:

“Defendant was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Dzikowska v. Superior Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Rish v. Iowa Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gold Kist, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. Pope v. Golden Rod Broilers, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte HoltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Glens Falls Ins. Co. of Glens Falls, NY v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Brownfield v. Revco D.S., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API