Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Harrington

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1922PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract to recover for building material in value exceeding $500, alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendant, and also a notarial fee for a protested check. Authorized by the pleadings the defendant contends that, on the plaintiffs’ evidence, if an agreement was made between them and the defendant it was an agreement to answer for the debt, default or misdoing of another, and, not being in writing, is unenforceable. R. L. c. 74, § 1 (now G. L. c. 259, § 1).

The evidence warranted a finding that the plaintiffs knew the defendant intimately when the alleged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Lyman B. Brooks Co. v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. American Locomotive Co. v. HamblenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Houghton & Dutton Co. v. Journal Engraving Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bendett v. BendettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. MalagutiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. W. W. Britton Inc. v. S. M. Hill Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Household Fuel Corp. v. HamacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  5. Chadwick & Carr Co. v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API