Legal Opinion

Star Technology, Inc. v. Tultex Corp.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 14, 1993No. Civ. A. 3:91-CV-1067-XPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KENDALL, District Judge.

NOW before the Court are Metzger’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, filed on November 9,1993, the response to that motion and the reply to the response. Having considered these filed materials and the applicable law, the Court determines that Metzger’s motion should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.

This is a $15 million copyright infringement case arising out of software arrangements among the parties. The instant motion pits Plaintiff against Defendant Austin Company’s former counsel, David Metzger. Plaintiff accuses Metzger…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stratagene v. Parsons Behle & LatimerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  2. Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Tempest Broadcasting Corp. v. Imlay, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  4. Jackson v. Kincaid, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Ahrens & DeAngeli, P.L.L.C. v. Flinn, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API