Legal Opinion
Cruz v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 16, 2000No. 99CA0716PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
In this automobile insurance coverage case involving an underinsured motorist provision, plaintiff, Raymond Cruz, appeals the summary judgment in favor of defendant, Farm ers Insurance Exchange (Farmers). We affirm.
The following facts are undisputed. While on duty as a policeman and driving a car that was assigned for his regular use by the police department, plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident. He sustained injuries in the accident and pursued, and eventually settled, a claim against the other motorist for the policy limits of that person's automobile…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Union Insurance Co. v. HoutzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Carl's Italian Restaurant v. Truck Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Baker v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Jaimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Heritage Estates Mutual Housing Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co. v. HoColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.