Legal Opinion
Faigenbaum MacHinery, Inc. v. Scott & Williams, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 26, 1972No. 69 Civ. 1388, 69 Civ. 5070, 71 Civ. 2510PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
These are motions by the defendant Scott & Williams, Inc., to transfer, pursuant to 28 U.S.C., section 1404(a), three actions, two of which were previously consolidated, to the Middle District of North Carolina, Greensboro Division, for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The matters normally considered on such a motion have been complicated by the circumstance that one plaintiff in the consolidated action, Faigenbaum Machinery, Inc. (hereafter Faigenbaum), consents to the transfer of its action, whereas the other, Bentley…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schneider v. SearsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Berman v. Informix Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Volk Corp. v. Art-Pak Clip Art ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Connors v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Ayers v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Burbank International, Ltd. v. Gulf Consolidated International Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.