Legal Opinion

Durham v. Harbin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 22, 1988No. 87-486PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case concerns the question of the enforceability of a real estate sales contract that falls under the Statute of Frauds.

Anthony and Sheila Durham sued Frank and Angela Harbin for the breach of an alleged agreement to sell some land. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that Frank Harbin had agreed (at least orally) to convey a lot in a subdivision for $7,600.1 Although the plaintiffs paid this money to the defendants, Harbin refused several requests to convey the lot, and there is no evidence that the Durhams ever took possession of it. In the subsequent suit by the Durhams for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dominex, Inc. v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Mazer v. Jackson Ins. AgencySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Holley Equipment Company, a Corporation v. Credit Alliance Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Russellville Production Credit Ass'n v. FrostSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wilma Corp. v. Fleming Foods of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Eric Steven Bower v. E. Michael Jones, Ruth Jones, and Ultramontane Associates, Incorporated, an Indiana Not-For-Profit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Brody v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Ex Parte RamsaySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Leisure American Resorts, Inc. v. KnutillaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API