Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1937No. 33,253PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This appeal involves the right of the state highway 'commission to abandon a condemnation proceeding after the appraisers had made their report and an appeal had been taken from the award, but before a hearing thereon in the district court. The trial court denied the highway commission’s motion to abandon the proceeding^ and it has appealed.

Perhaps it is best first to notice the pertinent statutes. G. S. 1935, 68-413, so far as here pertinent, reads:

“That the state highway commission, in the name of the state, may acquire title ... by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smouse v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Stewart v. Marland Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Todd v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Leavenworth, Northern & Southern Railway Co. v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Glover v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Board of Com'rs v. RayburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Bruna v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. State Highway Commission v. PuskarichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Rowhuff v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API