Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 22, 1935No. 13,700PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

On trial of plaintiff in error’s complaint for absolute divorce, and defendant in error’s cross-complaint for separate maintenance, verdicts favorable to defendant in error were returned. To consistent judgment error is assigned.

Plaintiff in error presents two points: (1) That the court erred in admitting a certain exhibit; (2) that the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence having to do with the questioned exhibit.

1. The exhibit was a letter from a third party (a woman), addressed to plaintiff in error, but the evidence does not show that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Cocroft v. CocroftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. East St. Louis Electric Railway Co. v. StoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Razor v. RazorIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. ColburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BullockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  2. Bilorusky v. BiloruskySupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API