Legal Opinion

East St. Louis Electric Railway Co. v. Stout

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1894PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Writ op Error to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District ; — heard in that court on appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. B. H. Canby, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

This was an action for personal injury of defendant in error, resulting, upon trial by jury, in a verdict for defendant in error of $1000, and judgment accordingly. On appeal to the Appellate Court this judgment was affirmed,' and the railway company prosecutes this writ of error.

The assignment of error questioning the rulings of the court on the admission of evidence has been abandoned in argument, and need not be considered.

No exception was preserved to the ruling of the court in the giving, refusing or modifying of instructions, or in overruling the motion for a new trial, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. FoulkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. East St. Louis Electric Street Railroad v. CauleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McCurdy v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HaselwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Fisher v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Cocroft v. CocroftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Commonwealth v. FusciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API