Wilson v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court■ — -Hon. Carlton M. Bliss, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
In controversies affecting the custody of an infant, the interest and welfare of the child is the primary and controlling question by which the court must be guided. This rule is based upon the theory that the state must perpetuate itself, and good citizenship is essential to that end. Though nature gives to parents the right to the custody of their own children, and such right is scarcely less sacred than the right to life and liberty, and is manifested in all animal life, yet among mankind, the necessity for government has forced the recognition of the rule, that the perpetuity of the state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mercein v. People ex rel. BarryNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Chapsky v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Miller v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- In re NeffWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Schammel v. SchammelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Ross v. PickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- C.R.S. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Krauthoff v. KrauthoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Spain v. HollandMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.