Lost Valley Timber, Inc. v. Power City Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Defendants, Power City Construction, Inc., Power Constructors, Inc., Power Two, and Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, appeal the denial of their motions and the final judgment. They contend that (1) the plaintiff, Lost Valley, is barred from recovering on its claim because of its failure to comply with the Alaska Contractor Registration Act, and (2) the district court erred by instructing the jury that it could find an implied contract. We agree with the first contention to the extent that Lost Valley contracted for work before registering. We disagree with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alaska Northern Development, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- McMillan v. Anchorage Community HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Wick Construction Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Sumner Development Corporation v. ShiversAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tiffany v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
- Lost Valley Timber, Inc. v. Power City Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987