Legal Opinion

Munk v. Kanzler

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1900No. 3,198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

This action was to enforce a mechanic’s lien for a balance due for work performed and material *107furnished in the construction of a certain building on the real estate described in the complaint. The complaint contained two paragraphs. It appears from the special findings of the court that judgment was rendered upon the second, which was based upon a written contract made a part of the complaint. Mo further reference, therefore, need be made to the first.

Appellant filed his amended answer to this paragraph, in which he sets up the following provision contained in the contract, to wit: “In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Supreme Council of the Order of Chosen Friends v. ForsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Rude v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Davis v. Badders & BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Lynch v. JenningsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maitland v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Vachier v. McCormickSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  3. Vachier v. McCormick, Alcaide & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API