Legal Opinion

Tommaso Argento v. Herbert A. Horn, U.S. Commissioner, Xavier North, U.S. Marshal, Folco Zugaro, Consul of the Republic of Italy

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 12, 1957No. 12824PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Circuit Judge.

Upon application of the Republic of Italy, certified by the Secretary of State of the United States, and upon complaint of the Italian Consul for Ohio and Kentucky, extradition proceedings were initiated against the appellant in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. After a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3184, the United States Commissioner con-cludéd that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the charge that the appellant was the same Tommaso Argento who had been convicted in absentia and sentenced to life imprisonment in Italy in 1931…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Charlton v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Factor v. LaubenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Clark v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Valentine v. United States Ex Rel. NeideckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Samuel Shapiro v. Thomas E. Ferrandina, United States Marshal for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. John Demjanjuk v. Joseph PetrovskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Matter of Extradition of DemjanjukDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
  4. Gallina v. FraserDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1959
  5. Matter of Extradition of ContrerasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API