Legal Opinion
Valentine v. United States Ex Rel. Neidecker
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 9, 1936No. Nos. 6—8PublishedCited by 181 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
Respondents sued out writs of habeas corpus to prevent their extradition to France under the Treaty of 1909. 37 Stat. 1526. They are native-born citizens of the United States and are charged with the commission of crimes in France which are among the extraditable offenses specified in the treaty. Having fled to the United States, they were arrested in New York City, on the request of the French authorities, under a preliminary warrant issued by a United States Commissioner and were held for extradition proceedings. By the writs of habeas corpus the jurisdiction of the Commissioner was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Foster v. NeilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- United States v. RauscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Charlton v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Factor v. LaubenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Rocha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Skaftouros v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.