Legal Opinion
(HC) Vela v. Montgomery
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 18, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00588Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MANUEL A. VELA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00588-EPG-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO NOTIFY THE COURT REGARDING HOW 13 v. PETITIONER WISHES TO PROCEED 14 W.L. MONTGOMERY, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 On April 28, 2020, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause why the petition should 20 not be dismissed for failure to exhaust state court remedies. (ECF No. 4). On May 15, 2020, 21…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arthur Robbins, III v. Tom L. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Michael Anthony v. Steven Cambra, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000