Legal Opinion
Jensen v. Hernandez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 30, 2012No. CIV S-09-0512 DAD PPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, United States Magistrate Judge:
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The parties have consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered against him on December 17, 2003 in the Sacramento County Superior Court on charges of spousal rape with force, false imprisonment, misdemeanor spousal battery, and making terrorist threats. Petitioner raises nineteen separate claims for federal habeas relief.…
2Cases cited258 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
253 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- (HC) Bottenfield v. RobertsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (HC) Brown v. RobertsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (HC) Duarte v. LizzaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (HC) McCarty v. KernanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- CLARK v. APPLIED CARDIAC SYSTEMS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.