Legal Opinion

CLARK v. APPLIED CARDIAC SYSTEMS INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01123Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRENT CLARK, MD, Plaintiff, 21cv1123 ELECTRONICALLY FILED v. APPLIED CARDIAC SYSTEMS INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER DISMISSING/REMANDING CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION I. Introduction This is a diversity of citizenship action grounded in state law and centered upon an alleged breach of contract, with subsequently added tort, fraud, and equitable claims. Pro Se Plaintiff, Brent Clark, M.D., a Pennsylvania resident, is a former doctor, and Defendant, Applied Cardiac Systems, Inc., a medical device…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Boag v. MacDougallSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API