Legal Opinion

Schmisseur v. Rebhan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 9, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Edwards

Harrison Sehmisseur, as guardian of certain minors, in 1932, prior to the enactment of the Civil Practice Act, filed a hill to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendant Elizabeth Rebhan, to secure an indebtedness of $12,000. It joined as defendants Frank H. Carson, trustee in a mortgage to secure certain notes aggregating $27,800, and also the several holders of the notes thereby secured. The Carson mortgage was a junior lien upon the premises sought to be foreclosed by the Schmisseur mortgage. The noteholders answered the bill, asking that they be paid any surplus of the proceeds of sale of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Phelps v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Malleable Iron Range Co. v. PuseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schaefer Ball Bearing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
  5. Palmer v. SangerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Karas v. SnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Case Prestressing Corp v. Chicago College of Osteopathic MedicineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Bernhardt v. FritzshallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Thompson v. KirschIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. AMERICAN FED. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N, ETC. v. KassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API