Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Kirsch

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1984No. 14201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

William and Marcia Kirsch have appealed from a deficiency judgment entered against them when Victor and Grace Thompson foreclosed a second deed of trust. The issues in this case are whether it was proper for the district court to enter a deficiency judgment and, if so, whether the court properly calculated the amount of the judgment. We hold that the district court properly awarded a deficiency judgment, but we remand for a recalculation of the amount.

In the spring of 1979, Darlene Morgan, who is not a party to this appeal, desired to purchase a Boise home owned by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Eastern Idaho Production Credit Ass'n v. Placerton, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Kamaole Resort Twenty-One v. Ficke Hawaiian Investments, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hudson City Savings Bank v. Hampton Gardens Ltd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Miller v. StavrosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Camp v. JiminezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Great Southwest Life Insurance Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Dursteler v. DurstelerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Spencer v. JamesonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. DaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API