Legal Opinion

Belcher v. Aaron

California Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1937No. Sac. 5074PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Pending the prosecution of a suit to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant bank, as mortgagee, made ex parte application for and procured the appointment of the defendant Aaron as receiver. The mortgagor, who is not a party to the present action, thereafter moved to vacate the order appointing receiver and it was set aside within a month after its entry. Upon appeal, the vacating order was affirmed. (Hibernia S. & L. Soc. v. Ellis Estate Co., 132 Cal. App. 408 [22 Pac. (2d) 806].) Subsequently, a decree of foreclosure was entered, the property sold pursuant thereto and a deficiency judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Casey v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Ellis Estate Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Bibby v. DieterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lee v. Ski Run Apartments AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API