Bibby v. Dieter
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County. H. D. Burroughs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action is in claim and delivery. Defendant denied the plaintiff’s ownership• and right to the possession of any of the property, and, as a further defense, alleged that he was holding the property by virtue of his appointment as receiver in an action commenced in the superior court of Lassen county by H. H. Wiencke against Samuel Bibby; that his accounts as such receiver have not been settled by said superior court, nor has any compensation been allowed him, though he has spent over $200 in earing for said property; that there is another action pending between the same parties; that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Hobson v. Pacific States Mercantile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- Wiencke v. BibbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Davila v. HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Illinois Refining Co. v. Illinois Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Wiencke v. BibbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Belcher v. AaronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Rondos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- In re SteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.