Legal Opinion

People v. Oubridge

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1918No. Crim. No. 789PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant was charged by information with the crime of attempting to pass a fictitious check and with a prior conviction of forgery. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced under the indeterminate sentence law.

The only point urged for reversal is that the court erred in permitting the district attorney to ask defendant, who had taken the stand in his own behalf, upon cross-examination if he had ever been convicted of a felony. It has been held that “where a defendant, though admitting the charge of prior' conviction upon arraignment, becomes a witness in his own behalf, he may be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. People v. MartiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RosencrantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API