Legal Opinion

People v. Rose

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1935No. Crim. 2750PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

On March 18, 1935, the rumble seat of an automobile driven by a cigaret salesman was pried open and a suitcase and hat belonging to the salesman were liftéd from the inside. The suitcase contained cartons of eigarets and some miscellaneous articles. By information charging petit theft and prior conviction of a felony, which latter charge defendant admitted, defendant was brought to trial for stealing the eigarets, valued at $20, contained in the suitcase. No one saw defendant open the rumble seat and take the articles described. The testimony showed, however, that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. ShelestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. People v. RosencrantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. FayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. People v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. People v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BrainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API