Legal Opinion

People v. Rosencrantz

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1928No. Docket No. 1492PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Defendant was tried before a jury on an information charging the fraudulent making, drawing and uttering a check upon a hank without sufficient funds, and also charging three prior convictions of separate felonies. The defendant denied the first prior conviction alleged and admitted the second and third. The jury found her guilty of the offense charged in the information and also found that she had suffered the first alleged prior conviction. She was thereupon sentenced to the state prison at San Quentin for the term prescribed by law, which, under the terms of section 644 of the Penal Code,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. People v. OubridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. HainlineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. People v. DunlopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. People v. D'A PhilippoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API