Conrad v. Perales
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CURTIN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On December 20, 1991, plaintiffs Conrad, Lisman, and Belote, as representatives of a purported class (“plaintiffs”), commenced this action against Cesar Pe-rales (“the Commissioner”), both individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services (“NYS DSS”). Plaintiffs allege that in 1989, the Commissioner wrongfully converted plaintiffs’ Medicaid “client shares” (“NAMIs”) 1 and/or their Medicare benefits. 2
On July 29, 1993, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion to certify the class, which…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reynolds v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Diamond" D" Const. v. New York State Dept. of Labor (" Dol") Bureau of Public WorksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Williston v. EgglestonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005