Legal Opinion
Williston v. Eggleston
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 27, 2005No. 04 Civ. 4454 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Verna Eggleston, Commissioner of the New York City Human Resources Administration (“City Commissioner” or the “City”) and Robert Doar, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (“State Commissioner” or the “State”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved under Rule 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) to dismiss the putative class action complaint (the “Complaint”) of Gertrude Williston (“Williston”) and Tawana Cum-mins, Latoya Cummins and Tandika Cum-mins, by their parent Paulette Cummins (collectively the “Cummins”)…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williston v. EgglestonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Barry v. CorriganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Winters v. MeyerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006