Legal Opinion

Moorman v. Parkerson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 6, 1912No. 19,167PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Third Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary; Henry Mayer, Judge ad hoc. Action by Moorman & Givens against John R. Parkerson. Erom the judgment, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.

The defendant, who was the junior member of the firm of Moorman & Parkerson, desiring to abandon the insurance agency business in which said firm was engaged, in the town of Eranklin, La., and remove to New Orleans to accept employment in the service of the federal government, sold his interest in said business and in said firm to the plaintiff firm, by the following contract;

“Eranklin, Louisiana,
“Jany. 6, 1908.
“The undersigned, Joseph R. Givens, agreed to buy from John R. Parkerson his one-half interest and good will in the firm of Moorman & Parkerson,_ in the insurance business, at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Fleckenstein Bros. v. FleckensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Moorman v. ParkersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. KokoskySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  5. State ex rel. Goff v. SawyersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hirsh v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Hirsh v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  3. Ryska v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Scotton v. WrightSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
  5. Desselle v. PetrossiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API