Legal Opinion
Moorman v. Parkerson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 3, 1911No. 18,221PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from Twenty-Third Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary; Henry Mayer, Judge ad hoc. Action by Moorman & Givens against John A. Parkerson. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment maintaining the exception of “no cause of action disclosed” and dismissing their suit. The petition at which the exception was leveled reads, in substance, as follows:
“That on the 6th day of January, 1908, for and on behalf of Moorman & Givens, * * * Joseph R. Givens purchased of John R. Parker-son his (said Parkerson’s) one-half interest in, and good will of, the firm of Moorman & Parker-son * * * in the insurance business, at Franklin, La., for the sum of $1,000, which firm was also domiciled and then doing business in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Fleckenstein Bros. v. FleckensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. KokoskySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Levine v. MichelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
- Webb Press Co. v. BierceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
3Cited by17 opinions
- Taquino v. Teledyne Monarch RubberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. ZumpeDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- Comet Industries, Inc. v. LawrenceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Gold & Suckle, Inc. v. SuckleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Barrera v. CiolinoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.