Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. Kokosky
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; John St. Paul, Judge. Action by the Eugene Dietzgen Company against Herman Kokosky. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
NICHOLLS, J.
The plaintiff alleged that by act executed on November 26, 1902, before Charles Rosen, notary, it purchased from the firm of S. T. Beer and Herman Kokosky, and the individual members thereof, the business of said firm, located in New Orleans, and since said date had operated said business for its own account. That, as one of the considerations of said purchase, said Samuel T. Beer and Herman Kokosky, and each of them, did expressly agree that they would not within the next five years succeeding the date of said agreement enter into or carry on the business of…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Durkin v. CobleighMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Cary v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Loranger v. Citizens' Nat. BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Hirsh v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Moorman v. ParkersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Barfield v. SaundersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Love v. DedonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.