Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 23, 1991No. 89-564PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This appeal from a divorce judgment entered eighteen months after the hearing on the merits presents such a procedural morass that a remand is necessary to reach an outcome in a manner consistent with the civil rules.

Following a divorce hearing held May 2, 1988, the trial court filed, on August 18, 1988, a document entitled, “Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Notice of Decision.” In it, the court di rected the husband’s counsel to prepare a judgment. The decision divided the parties’ net equity in marital property relatively equally and awarded the wife $300 a week in maintenance. For a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Klein v. KleinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. King v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Nevitt v. NevittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. Stickney v. StickneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Golden v. Cooper-EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. Golden v. Cooper-EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Strauss v. StraussSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API