Strauss v. Strauss
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
The sole issue in this appeal from a final divorce order of the Chittenden Family Court is whether defendant Roberta Strauss is entitled to permanent maintenance, rather than time-limited rehabilitative maintenance, from her husband Michael Strauss. We hold that she is so entitled and reverse and remand.
At the time of the divorce in 1991, defendant was forty-eight years old and plaintiff was fifty-one years old. They were married in 1968, and shortly thereafter plaintiff earned a Ph.D. in chemistry. Following a short post-doctoral program in Scotland, they settled in Burlington when plaintiff…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Klein v. KleinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Walter v. WalterSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Quesnel v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Delozier v. DelozierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Gravel v. GravelSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Soutiere v. SoutiereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Clapp v. ClappSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Braun v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.