Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Strauss

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 11, 1993No. 91-334PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

The sole issue in this appeal from a final divorce order of the Chittenden Family Court is whether defendant Roberta Strauss is entitled to permanent maintenance, rather than time-limited rehabilitative maintenance, from her husband Michael Strauss. We hold that she is so entitled and reverse and remand.

At the time of the divorce in 1991, defendant was forty-eight years old and plaintiff was fifty-one years old. They were married in 1968, and shortly thereafter plaintiff earned a Ph.D. in chemistry. Following a short post-doctoral program in Scotland, they settled in Burlington when plaintiff…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Klein v. KleinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. Walter v. WalterSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Quesnel v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Delozier v. DelozierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  2. Gravel v. GravelSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Soutiere v. SoutiereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Clapp v. ClappSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. Braun v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API