Legal Opinion

State v. Soto

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2012No. 2010AP2273-CRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 1. This case is before us on certification from the court of appeals, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 809.61 (2009-10).1 The court of appeals certified questions of statutory-interpretation from the appeal of the decision of the circuit court for Trempealeau County2 that denied Jon Anthony Soto's postsentencing motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Soto contends that his right under Wis. Stat. § 971.04(l)(g) to be present in the same courtroom as the presiding judge at his plea hearing was violated when the court conducted the hearing via videoconferencing technology.3 The State contends that if…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. NdinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Richards v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. PinnoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Xcel Energy Services, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. Eddie Lee AnthonyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Russell Adams v. Northland Equipment Company, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API