Legal Opinion
Madelux International, Inc. v. Barama Co.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided February 15, 2005No. CIV.01-1862(HL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAFFITTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Madelux International Inc. (hereinafter “Madelux”), filed an amended complaint against defendants Barama Co. Ltd. (hereinafter “Barama”), Sterling Wood Products, Inc. (“Sterling”), and Aljo-ma Lumber Inc. (“Aljoma”), alleging that Barama and Sterling terminated Made-lux’s exclusive sales agreement to distribute plywood in Puerto Rico without just cause in violation of Puerto Rico’s Act 75, 10 L.P.R.A. § 278 et seq. (“Law 75”). (Docket No. 32, amended complaint.) Defendant Barama, in turn, argues that there was no “dealer’s contract” between…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Triangle Trading Co. v. Robroy Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Borschow Hospital & Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Cesar Castillo Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Irvine v. Murad Skin Research Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Vulcan Tools of Puerto Rico v. Makita Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- R.W. International Corp. v. Welch Food, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Medina & Medina, Inc. v. Hormel Foods CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Madelux International, Inc. v. Barama Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006