Legal Opinion
Madelux International, Inc. v. Barama Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 16, 2006No. 05-1568, 05-1862PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal in which the applicable standard of review determines the outcome. In the underlying action, plaintiff-appellant Madelux International, Inc. (Mil) sued three defendants — Barama Co. Ltd. (Barama), Sterling Wood Products Corp. (Sterling), and Aljoma Lumber, Inc. (Aljoma) — for pecuniary damages. Its amended complaint (the operative pleading for present purposes) alleged that the lead defendant, Barama, had transgressed the Dealer’s Act, P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 10, § 278a (Law 75), by terminating, without the required statutory notice or cause, a purported…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wilma Cumpiano A/K/A Wilma Cumpiano Sanchez v. Banco Santander Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- New Comm Wireless Services, Inc. v. SprintCom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Borschow Hospital & Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Cesar Castillo Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Comm Wireless v. SprintCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Jose Santiago Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2022