Legal Opinion
Irvine v. Murad Skin Research Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 15, 1999No. 98-1595PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
ACOSTA, Senior District Judge.
On appeal defendant-appellant Murad Skin Research Laboratories, Inc. (“Mu-rad”) challenges the verdict rendered in favor of both plaintiffs IRG RESEARCH GROUP, INC. (“IRG”) and Ileana Irvine (“Irvine”). Specifically, Murad alleges that the district court erred by (1) not granting its motion for judgment as a matter of law; (2) declining to charge the jury in accordance with its proffered instruction on foreseeability; (3) denying its petition for a new trial; and (4) allowing the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert witness.
On review we agree with…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Katz v. City Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Marina Industrial, Inc. v. Brown Boveri Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1983
- Rivera Pérez v. Cruz CorchadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Wilson v. Bradlees of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Cummings v. Standard Register Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Marcano-Rivera v. Pueblo International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Angela Figueroa-Torres v. Pedro Toledo-Davila, Julio Peréz-TiradoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Seahorse Marine Supplies, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.