Legal Opinion
Pierre v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 10, 1991No. 91 C 3751PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Defendant UPS’s motion to dismiss is granted without prejudice. Plaintiff is given leave to refile her complaint in conformity with the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 11707. The plaintiff’s motion to remand is denied since this suit is governed by federal law.
I. FACTS
In early September of 1987, Plaintiff, Ulwyn Pierre, entered into an agreement with United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) to deliver 40 boxes of books, records, research papers and other personal property from 509 West 121st Street, Apt. 102, New York, New York to 10841 Longwood Drive, Chicago, Illinois.
Plai…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Arthur Lister v. H. Allan StarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- American Railway Express Co. v. LeveeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harvey J. Sanner, Warren D. Jones, Also Known as Corky, H. Dean Adkins v. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Patrick H. Arbor, Donald G. AndrewCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Orlick v. J.D. Carton & Son, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Bear MGC Cutlery Co. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
- Taylor v. Mayflower Transit, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1998
- Mudd-Lyman Sales & Service Corp. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.