Legal Opinion
Mudd-Lyman Sales & Service Corp. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 26, 2002No. 00 C 5648PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEINENWEBER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant United Parcel Service Inc.’s (“UPS”) Motion for Summary Judgment. Also before the Court is Plaintiff Mudd-Lyman Sales and Service Corp.’s (“Mudd-Lyman”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike.
BACKGROUND
Mudd-Lyman, an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Skok-ie, Illinois, sells and markets hardware products to retailers and wholesalers. UPS is a shipping service corporation organized under the laws of Ohio with its principal place of business in Atlanta, Georgia. At a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- ProCD, Inc. v. ZeidenbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Lourdes C. Vanasco v. National-Louis UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burton v. Airborne Express, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Meridian Project Systems, Inc. v. Hardin Construction Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2006
- E.J. Rogers, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2004
- Great American Insurance Agency v. United Parcel ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Burton v. Airborne ExpressAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.