Legal Opinion

Mead v. Metcalf

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from an order discharging L. W. Mead from custody made by Hon. James A. Miner, judge of the district court of the first district.

1Opinion of the Court

ZANE, O. J.:

The plaintiff was arrested for a violation of an alleged ordinance of Ogden City prohibiting dentists from practicing their profession without a license from a board of examiners appointed by the city council; and the court below discharged him after a hearing upon a writ of habeas corpus. From the order of discharge the defendant has prosecuted' an appeal to this court, and the plaintiff moves the court to dismiss for the reason that the right of appeal does not* exist from such an order.

When an individual is unlawfully deprived of his liberty a writ of habeas corpus is his most…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re ClasbyUtah Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. SchusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Winnovich v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Wisener, Sheriff v. BurrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Petuskey v. ClydeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1964
  5. Ex Parte SullivanNevada Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API