Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1986No. 15041-15043Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMorgan, Justice

In appeal # 15041, I concur in the result based on the last proposition only. In appeal # 15042, I concur in the result as to Issue I, dissent as to Issue IV, and concur in Issues II, III, V and VI. In appeal # 15043, I concur.

I take issue with the holding that commercial cattle herds raised for sale at public livestock markets are collateral “of a type customarily sold on a recognized market” for purposes of SDCL 57A-9-504(3), hereafter 9-504(3). The reasoning by which the author arrives at that conclusion is convoluted and internally inconsistent.

The author misapplies Judge Porter’s…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API