Legal Opinion
State v. De Anda
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 3, 2018No. 2 CA-CR 2017-0207PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
EPPICH, Judge:
¶ 1 Alfonso De Anda III, appeals his convictions and sentences for two counts each of aggravated driving under the influence and aggravated driving with a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or more. He argues the trial court should have suppressed the results of a test of his blood.1 Because we find no error, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 We review the evidence presented at the suppression hearing "in the light most favorable to sustaining the court's ruling, deferring to the court's determination of facts and witness credibility but reviewing de novo its legal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State of Arizona v. Francisco L Encinas ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Arizona v. Alfonso De Anda IIIArizona Supreme Court · 2019