State of Arizona v. Alfonso De Anda III
Arizona Supreme Court
CHIEF JUSTICE BALES authored the opinion of the Court, in which VICE CHIEF JUSTICE BRUTINEL and JUSTICES PELANDER, TIMMER, BOLICK, GOULD, and LOPEZ joined.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, opinion of the Court:
¶1 Alfonso De Anda III submitted to a blood test after he was arrested for driving under the influence. He argues his consent was involuntary under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because, before he was asked if he would submit to the test, the police officer told him his driving privileges would be suspended if he refused. We disagree. Unlike the officer in State v. Valenzuela , 239 Ariz. 299 , 371 P.3d 627 (2016) (" Valenzuela II "), the officer here did not tell De Anda he was required to submit to the test, and the officer's…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State of Arizona v. Hon. butler/tyler B.Arizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Dale Shawn HausnerArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State of Arizona v. Francisco L Encinas ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Diaz v. Hon. bernini/state/tucson City ProsecutorArizona Supreme Court · 2019