Legal Opinion

Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Garamendi

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 2006No. A106606, A107365PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, J. * —

I

Introduction

Appellants are three affiliated insurance companies—Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Ohio Casualty), West American Insurance Company (West American), and American Fire and Casualty Company (American Fire). * 1 They appeal from the superior court’s denial of their petition for writ of administrative mandamus or writ of mandate (the petition). The petition challenged an order of the California Insurance Commissioner (the Commissioner) requiring appellants to pay certain assessments imposed by California’s FAIR Plan Association (Fair Access to Insurance…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mercury Ins. Co. v. Lara, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Santa Clara Waste Water Co. v. Allied World Nat'l Assurance Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. California FAIR Plan Assn. v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Mercury Ins. Co. v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Mercury Insurance Co. v. LaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API