Legal Opinion
Archibald v. Cinerama Hawaiian Hotels, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 6, 1977No. Civ. 16378PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REGAN, J.
This is a plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered upon an order sustaining demurrers without leave to amend. The first amended complaint, to which the demurrers were sustained, is for breach of an innkeeper’s duty. It contains three causes of action. It asserts a class action by plaintiff as a member of a class of persons who are citizens and residents of California and who have been guests of hotels and motels in Hawaii which are owned or operated by a multitude of named defendants who do business in California. Also included is a named travel agency and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shapiro v. Wells Fargo Realty AdvisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Koire v. Metro Car WashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- United Nuclear Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Sklar v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hooper v. DeukmejianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.