Legal Opinion

State v. Finlay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 17, 2013No. 11C43608; A149582PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

The state appeals an order suppressing evidence discovered during a warrantless search of a trailer attached to defendant’s vehicle. It contends that the search was lawful under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement and, therefore, that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to suppress. On review for errors of law, State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 75, 854 P2d 421 (1993), we conclude that the search fell within the automobile exception. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Operating on a tip from an informant, Silverton Detective Aljets…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CrudoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. SargentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Estate of James Ritchie v. HelbigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. State v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API