Legal Opinion

State v. Bliss

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 2017No. 14C41783; A157214PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

In State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 273-79, 721 P2d 1357 (1986), the Supreme Court recognized the Oregon automobile exception to the warrant requirement of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. Under that exception, “ [p] robable cause to believe that a lawfully stopped vehicle which was mobile at the time of the stop contains contraband or other crime evidence justifies an immediate war-rantless search of the entire automobile for the object of the search.” Id. at 277. The question in this case is whether our state’s automobile exception applies where police lawfully stop a moving…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wimberly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. KockOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BlissOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. KlineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API