State v. Ragland
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Defendant Joseph Ragland appeals from his conviction of second degree rape, two counts of second degree forcible sex offense, and sexual servitude. On appeal, defendant primarily contends that the trial court committed plain error when it allowed the State’s expert witness to testify that certain DNA evidence could have come from no one else in the world other than defendant. We agree that this testimony constituted the “prosecutor’s fallacy” that the United States Supreme Court found improper in McDaniel v. Brown, 558 U.S. 120, 175 L. Ed. 2d 582, 130 S. Ct. 665 (2010) (per…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDaniel v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. RouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. RankinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. GanttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.