Schlueter v. Raymond Bros. & Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Eeeoe to the district court for Saline county, to which the cause had been brought on error from the county court. cited Lupton v. Cutter, 8 Pick., 298. Core v. ClAsby, Id., 555. Tucker v. Clisby, 12 Id., 22. Sanford v. Bliss, Id., 116. Brice v. Masterton, 85 Ala., 483. Lightfoot v. Rupert, 38 Id., 666. Kimball v. Mulhern, 15 111., 208. Case v. Ingersoll, 7 Kan., 367. The interest of the garnishee relates solely to a just determination of the amount due from him to the…
Read the full summary
Eeeoe to the district court for Saline county, to which the cause had been brought on error from the county court. cited Lupton v. Cutter, 8 Pick., 298. Core v. ClAsby, Id., 555. Tucker v. Clisby, 12 Id., 22. Sanford v. Bliss, Id., 116. Brice v. Masterton, 85 Ala., 483. Lightfoot v. Rupert, 38 Id., 666. Kimball v. Mulhern, 15 111., 208. Case v. Ingersoll, 7 Kan., 367. The interest of the garnishee relates solely to a just determination of the amount due from him to the judgment debtor. He can have no interest in the disposition of that amount after it is determined to his satisfaction. But…
1Opinion of the Court
Gantt, Oh. J.
The defendants in error recovered a judgment against Brigham and Hassler in the county court. Execution was issued on this judgment, upon which the officer made return that he could find no property whereon to levy the same. The plaintiff in error was then summoned as garnishee, touching the rights, credits, and property of Brigham and Hassler in his possession. To this garnishment his answer substantially states that on the 22d of August, 1876, Brigham and Hassler made and executed to him a voluntary assignment of all their property and effects of every description whatever, for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brashear v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Case v. IngersollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. SamuelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Hollingsworth v. FitzgeraldNebraska Supreme Court · 1884