Legal Opinion

Case v. Ingersoll

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

JError from Labette District Court. Ingersoll, a judgment-creditor, obtained an order of attachment against W. M. Johnson, a judgment-debtor, and caused Nelson Case to be summoned as garnishee. Written interrogatories were filed as required by § 503 of the civil code.

Read the full summary

JError from Labette District Court. Ingersoll, a judgment-creditor, obtained an order of attachment against W. M. Johnson, a judgment-debtor, and caused Nelson Case to be summoned as garnishee. Written interrogatories were filed as required by § 503 of the civil code. Case answered, alleging that Johnson had made an assignment to him (Case) of all his property for the benefit of creditors; admitted that he had possession and control of such, property, and denied having any other property of Johnson’s under his control, and denied all indebtedness. -His answers are set forth in full in the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

A judgment was rendered before a justice of the peace of Labette county in favor of Margaret Ingersoll, the defendant in error, and against W. M. Johnson, (assignor of plaintiff in error,) for $200 and costs; a transcript of the judgment was filed in the office of the clerk of the district court of said county; execution was issued thereon and returned^ unsatisfied; an affidavit of J. D. McCue, one of the attorneys of Margaret Ingersoll was filed in said clerk’s office, setting forth that he had good reason to believe and did believe *371that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schloredt v. BoydenWyoming Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Cuendet v. LahmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Schlueter v. Raymond Bros. & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Douglas County National Bank v. SandsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API