State v. Zimmerman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marshall District Court. — How. S. M. Weaver, Judge. Defendant was indicted and convicted of keeping a nuisance, by maintaining a place for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors. He now appeals to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
i liqvob mildence- prior restoration of liquors. I. The evidence shows that the sheriff or his deputy, before the indictment in the case was found, had seized, upon a search-warrant, a greaf number of bottles of beer, found in defendant’s place of business, —a restaurant pept at State Center The beer was taken to Marshalltown. The defendant offered to prove that the beer was released from the seizure, and restored to defendant, but the grounds of such action were not stated, nor proposed to be shown. The evidence was rightly rejected for these reasons.
II. It was not proposed to show that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Collins v. HillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- State v. ArlunoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- State v. BowmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890